Soybean Screening Trials for Resistance to Iron Deficiency Chlorosis, 2001

 

R. Jay Goos and Brian Johnson

Department of Soil Science

North Dakota State University

Fargo, North Dakota 58105

rj.goos@ndsu.nodak.edu

 

 

Introduction

 

Iron deficiency chlorosis of soybeans is a widespread problem on high pH soils of the Upper Midwest. High water tables, too much rainfall, salinity in the soil, calcium carbonate in the topsoil, and elevated soil nitrate levels all contribute to the problem. As a species, soybean is more sensitive to iron deficiency than other crops, such as wheat or barley. Since iron is relatively immobile in the plant, iron deficiency appears as a yellowing of the upper parts of the plant. If the youngest leaves and growing point are damaged, growth will be stunted and yields will be reduced substantially. Even a temporary yellowing reduces yield, even if the plants eventually recover and appear normal later in the growing season.

There are several available control measures to reduce the severity of iron deficiency chlorosis. The most effective is variety selection. The selection of a resistant variety can make the difference between success and failure when growing soybeans on high pH soils. From our experience, we suggest varieties with a chlorosis rating equal to or better than the variety Council when growing soybeans on soils prone to producing chlorosis. For soils with a severe chlorosis potential, obtain the most resistant varieties available.

 

How these studies were performed

 

Four field studies were performed in eastern North Dakota in 2001. The sites used had been observed for several years, and known to produce a relatively uniform chlorosis in soybeans. Soil characteristics of the four sites are shown in Table 1. 181 public and commercial varieties were grown in short (5’) rows on 30-inch centers. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. At the 2-3 trifoliolate stage, 5-6 trifoliolate stage, and two weeks after the 5-6 trifoliolate stage, visual chlorosis ratings were made. A 1-5 scale was used, where 1=no chlorosis, plants were normal and green; 2=a slight yellowing of the upper leaves, there was no differentiation in color between the leaf veins and interveinal areas; 3=interveinal chlorosis of the upper leaves (veins green and interveinal areas chlorotic), but no obvious stunting of growth or death of leaf tissue (necrosis) evident; 4=interveinal chlorosis of the upper leaves, with some apparent stunting of growth or necrosis of plant tissue; 5=severe chlorosis, with stunted growth and the youngest leaves and growing point necrotic. Each plot was rated plus or minus 0.5 chlorosis unit.

To "calibrate" the chlorosis studies, four "standard" varieties were included with a known reaction to chlorosis stress. The standard varieties, from most resistant to most susceptible were Traill, Council, Glacier, and Mycogen 5072. The varieties Traill, Council, and Glacier were also entered into the trials more than once to help determine the reproducibility of the screening studies.

 

Results

 

The results are shown in Table 2, with the varieties ranked from the most resistant to the most susceptible. Iron chlorosis research is difficult to perform in the field, due to soil variability. Overall, we were very pleased with our studies in 2001. Chlorosis was uniform across all four of our sites through the 5-6 trifoliolate stage. After the 5-6 trifoliolate stage at the Galesburg site, the soybeans tended to recover in part of the trial, so the third rating was not made at this site.

We were also very pleased with the separation and reproducibility of our "standard" varieties. As expected, the chlorosis resistance of the standard varieties was ranked as expected: Traill > Council > Glacier > Mycogen 5072. The ratings of Traill, Council, and Glacier were generally within 0.1 chlorosis unit, and we were very pleased with this result. When averaged across all four sites, the ratings have an experimental error of 0.2 to 0.3 chlorosis units.

 

 

How to use these tables

 

There are many factors that go into the selection of a soybean variety, such as maturity, disease resistance, and yield potential. When selecting a variety for high pH soils, however, a high level of chlorosis resistance has to be added to this list. Even a temporary yellowing can cause yield loss. The extra bushel or two of yield potential of a less resistant variety is easily lost if the crop becomes chlorotic.

Finally, not every soil in North Dakota is suitable for soybean production. If soil conditions are bad enough, any soybean variety can turn chlorotic. While there are substantial differences between the most resistant and most susceptible soybean varieties, abnormally elevated salinity or prolonged waterlogging can make even the most resistant variety turn chlorotic. If a resistant variety, such as Traill, cannot be successfully grown on a field due to chlorosis, the field is probably not suitable for soybean production.

A spreadsheet file, with a more complete listing of the data, is available by e-mail. Please send any requests to Dr. Goos at the e-mail address at the beginning of this report.

This research was supported by the North Dakota Soybean Council.

 

 

Table 1. Chemical characteristics of the soils at the four field locations.

 

 

Site

 

Soil testÝ

 

Units

 

Amenia

 

Argusville

 

Ayr

 

Galesburg

 

0-6"

 

pH

 

8.2

 

8.1

 

8.0

 

8.0

 

EC (salinity)

 

mmho/cm

 

0.57

 

0.41

 

0.98

 

2.03

 

CaCO3

 

%

 

11.1

 

5.7

 

11.9

 

5.0

 

Org. matter

 

%

 

3.4

 

2.8

 

3.2

 

2.4

 

Nitrate-N

 

lb/A

 

36

 

19

 

38

 

82

 

Olsen P

 

ppm

 

10

 

9

 

14

 

24

 

Avail. K

 

ppm

 

350

 

180

 

700

 

470

 

Avail. S

 

lb/A

 

118

 

35

 

166

 

317

 

6-24"

 

EC

 

mmho/cm

 

1.22

 

0.39

 

1.23

 

0.79

 

Nitrate-N

 

lb/A

 

42

 

54

 

324

 

180

 

Avail. S

 

lb/A

 

>500

 

130

 

>500

 

>500

Ý pH and EC of a 1:1 soil:water suspension, CaCO3 equivalent by the Williams method, organic matter by loss on ignition, available K by ammonium acetate extraction, and available S by monocalcium phosphate extraction.

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Chlorosis ratings of 181 soybean varieties at four sites in eastern North Dakota, 2001. At each site, each value is the average of three rating times and four replications, except at Galesburg, where two ratings were made.

 

 

 

Site

 

Company

 

Variety

 

Amenia

 

Argusville

 

Ayr

 

Galesburg

 

Average

 

U. of MN

 

MN 0302

 

1.6

 

1.7

 

1.5

 

1.8

 

1.6

 

Seeds 2000

 

2070 RR

 

1.5

 

1.7

 

1.6

 

2.3

 

1.8

 

Pioneer

 

P 90B43

 

2.0

 

1.7

 

1.8

 

1.9

 

1.8

 

Standard

 

Traill

 

2.0

 

2.1

 

1.3

 

2.0

 

1.9

 

Top Farm

 

TF 6101

 

1.8

 

1.7

 

2.0

 

2.1

 

1.9

 

King Grain

 

KG-20

 

2.0

 

2.1

 

1.6

 

1.8

 

1.9

 

Hyland

 

RR Rally

 

1.8

 

1.9

 

1.6

 

2.3

 

1.9

 

Mycogen

 

5007

 

1.8

 

1.9

 

1.6

 

2.4

 

1.9

 

Kaystar

 

K-0760 RR

 

1.9

 

1.6

 

1.8

 

2.6

 

2.0

 

NDSU

 

Traill

 

2.0

 

2.1

 

1.3

 

2.4

 

2.0

 

U. of MN

 

MN 0201

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

1.7

 

2.3

 

2.0

 

Wensman

 

W 2095 RR

 

2.1

 

2.0

 

1.7

 

2.1

 

2.0

 

Gold Country

 

GCS-6009 RR

 

2.1

 

2.0

 

1.4

 

2.6

 

2.0

 

Wensman

 

W 2054 RR

 

2.1

 

2.2

 

1.9

 

1.9

 

2.0

 

Standard

 

Traill

 

2.0

 

2.2

 

1.5

 

2.4

 

2.0

 

Prairie Brand Seed Co.

 

PB-0321 RR

 

2.1

 

2.1

 

1.9

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

NorthStar

 

NS 0714 RR

 

2.2

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

SDSU

 

SD96-702

 

2.4

 

2.0

 

1.4

 

2.4

 

2.1

 

Dyna-Gro

 

3074 RR

 

2.4

 

2.3

 

1.7

 

1.8

 

2.1

 

NDSU

 

Council

 

2.5

 

2.3

 

1.4

 

2.1

 

2.1

 

Wensman

 

W 2081 RR

 

2.2

 

2.6

 

1.4

 

2.1

 

2.1

 

Pioneer

 

Exp 03

 

2.0

 

1.9

 

1.8

 

2.8

 

2.1

 

Garst

 

XR 0105 P01

 

2.3

 

2.3

 

1.9

 

2.1

 

2.1

 

Peterson Farms Seed

 

0009 RR

 

2.0

 

2.8

 

1.5

 

2.2

 

2.1

 

Gold Country

 

GCS-3205 RR

 

2.3

 

2.5

 

1.7

 

2.1

 

2.2

 

Mallard

 

'0910

 

2.4

 

1.8

 

1.9

 

2.6

 

2.2

 

Brushvale

 

B.S. 9908 N

 

2.4

 

2.3

 

1.9

 

2.1

 

2.2

 

Garst

 

X 0108 P70

 

2.4

 

1.9

 

1.7

 

2.7

 

2.2

 

Thunder

 

607 RR

 

2.4

 

2.2

 

1.9

 

2.3

 

2.2

 

Peterson Farms Seed

 

0006 RR

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

1.8

 

2.0

 

2.2

 

Midwest Seed Genetics

 

GR 0955

 

2.2

 

1.9

 

1.8

 

2.8

 

2.2

 

Standard

 

Council

 

2.1

 

2.5

 

1.7

 

2.5

 

2.2

 

Kaystar

 

K-0960 RR

 

2.3

 

2.6

 

2.0

 

1.9

 

2.2

 

NDSU

 

Traill RR

 

2.3

 

2.2

 

1.8

 

2.6

 

2.2

 

NorthStar

 

NS 0905 RR

 

2.3

 

2.6

 

1.3

 

2.8

 

2.2

 

Dekalb

 

DKB 09-51

 

2.5

 

2.7

 

1.8

 

1.9

 

2.2

 

Kaystar

 

K-0520 RR

 

2.4

 

2.5

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

2.2

 

Standard

 

Council

 

2.2

 

2.4

 

2.0

 

2.4

 

2.3

 

Mallard

 

RR X0912

 

2.5

 

2.2

 

1.8

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

Syngenta

 

NK Brand S10-F2

 

2.3

 

1.8

 

2.0

 

3.0

 

2.3

 

Mustang

 

M-093 RR

 

2.2

 

2.0

 

2.0

 

2.9

 

2.3

 

Stine

 

S0806-4

 

2.3

 

2.2

 

1.9

 

2.8

 

2.3

 

Seeds 2000

 

2081 RR

 

2.3

 

2.4

 

1.9

 

2.4

 

2.3

 

Thunder

 

2109 RR

 

2.3

 

2.4

 

1.5

 

2.9

 

2.3

 

Wensman

 

W 2092 RR

 

2.5

 

2.3

 

2.1

 

2.3

 

2.3

 

NuTech

 

NT-0777 RR

 

2.2

 

2.4

 

2.1

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

Asgrow

 

AG 0801

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

1.6

 

2.9

 

2.3

 

Mallard

 

RR X0913

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

2.0

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

Mycogen

 

5121

 

2.4

 

2.7

 

1.9

 

2.4

 

2.4

 

U. of MN

 

M94-175050

 

2.1

 

2.2

 

2.0

 

3.3

 

2.4

 

Mustang

 

M-082 RR

 

2.4

 

2.3

 

1.8

 

3.1

 

2.4

 

Hyland

 

Corona

 

2.5

 

2.6

 

1.5

 

2.8

 

2.4

 

U. of MN

 

M92-185003

 

2.8

 

2.3

 

2.1

 

2.4

 

2.4

 

NDSU

 

Walsh

 

2.7

 

2.6

 

1.7

 

2.6

 

2.4

 

NDSU

 

Norpro-Rps6

 

2.6

 

2.9

 

1.7

 

2.6

 

2.4

 

Hyland

 

RR Richland

 

2.8

 

2.4

 

1.8

 

2.8

 

2.4

 

U. of MN

 

MN 0902 CN

 

2.7

 

2.8

 

2.0

 

2.3

 

2.4

 

NDSU

 

Jim

 

2.8

 

2.6

 

1.9

 

2.6

 

2.5

 

NDSU

 

Danatto

 

2.1

 

2.8

 

2.1

 

2.8

 

2.5

 

NDSU

 

ND97-1120

 

2.6

 

2.6

 

2.0

 

2.6

 

2.5

 

NDSU

 

Daksoy

 

2.3

 

2.8

 

1.9

 

2.8

 

2.5

 

NorthStar

 

NS 0805 RR

 

2.6

 

2.6

 

1.8

 

3.0

 

2.5

 

Thunder

 

2108 RR

 

2.5

 

3.3

 

2.0

 

2.3

 

2.5

 

U. of MN

 

M92-285024

 

2.8

 

2.8

 

1.7

 

2.8

 

2.5

 

Syngenta

 

NK Brand S04-E1

 

2.8

 

2.8

 

1.9

 

2.6

 

2.5

 

Top Farm

 

TF E1091 A RR

 

2.8

 

2.6

 

1.8

 

2.9

 

2.5

 

Brushvale

 

B.S. 9960 P

 

2.7

 

2.6

 

2.0

 

2.9

 

2.5

 

Kaltenberg

 

KB081 RR

 

2.8

 

2.6

 

1.9

 

2.9

 

2.5

 

Seeds 2000

 

2110 RR

 

2.7

 

3.0

 

1.8

 

2.6

 

2.5

 

Prograin

 

PR 0121 RR

 

2.7

 

2.3

 

2.1

 

3.2

 

2.5

 

Prograin

 

PR 9901

 

2.9

 

2.8

 

2.4

 

2.2

 

2.6

 

Hyland

 

T 9801

 

2.8

 

2.6

 

1.8

 

3.1

 

2.6

 

Dairyland Seed

 

DSR-101/RR

 

2.9

 

3.2

 

2.0

 

2.3

 

2.6

 

Gold Country

 

GCS-4107 RR

 

2.7

 

2.7

 

2.1

 

2.8

 

2.6

 

Dyna-Gro

 

3086 RR

 

2.5

 

3.0

 

2.2

 

2.7

 

2.6

 

Syngenta

 

NK Brand S06-L6

 

3.0

 

2.9

 

2.0

 

2.5

 

2.6

 

AgriPro

 

1394

 

2.5

 

2.8

 

2.0

 

3.1

 

2.6

 

Thunder

 

2030

 

3.3

 

2.7

 

2.1

 

2.4

 

2.6

 

Prograin

 

PR 5001.14

 

2.5

 

2.3

 

2.4

 

3.3

 

2.6

 

Gold Country

 

GCS-3202 RR

 

3.0

 

2.4

 

2.2

 

2.9

 

2.6

 

Pioneer

 

Exp 07

 

2.8

 

3.0

 

1.8

 

2.9

 

2.6

 

NDSU

 

ND97-962

 

2.7

 

2.5

 

2.1

 

3.3

 

2.6

 

Asgrow

 

AG 0901

 

2.8

 

2.5

 

2.4

 

2.9

 

2.7

 

Thompson Agri

 

TR-077

 

2.8

 

3.3

 

1.8

 

2.8

 

2.7

 

Wensman

 

W 2086 RR

 

2.8

 

2.5

 

2.4

 

2.9

 

2.7

 

Kaystar

 

K-0740 RR

 

2.8

 

2.8

 

2.3

 

2.8

 

2.7

 

Richland Organics

 

MK 0649 N

 

3.1

 

3.0

 

1.9

 

2.8

 

2.7

 

Wensman

 

W 2025 RR

 

3.2

 

3.0

 

2.5

 

2.1

 

2.7

 

Richand Organics

 

MK-Exp 917 N

 

3.2

 

3.3

 

1.7

 

2.8

 

2.7

 

NDSU

 

Barnes

 

3.0

 

2.8

 

2.2

 

2.9

 

2.7

 

Dairyland Seed

 

DSR-065

 

2.8

 

2.4

 

2.8

 

3.0

 

2.7

 

Gold Country

 

Bygland

 

3.0

 

2.9

 

1.8

 

3.2

 

2.7

 

Standard

 

Glacier

 

3.0

 

2.8

 

2.3

 

2.9

 

2.8

 

Standard

 

Glacier

 

3.0

 

2.9

 

2.3

 

2.9

 

2.8

 

Golden Harvest

 

X 11091RR

 

2.9

 

2.9

 

2.4

 

2.9

 

2.8

 

Midwest Seed Genetics

 

GR 1100

 

3.1

 

3.7

 

1.9

 

2.4

 

2.8

 

Pioneer

 

Exp 10

 

3.0

 

3.0

 

2.1

 

3.1

 

2.8

 

Mallard

 

RR 1011

 

3.1

 

3.4

 

2.1

 

2.6

 

2.8

 

Garst

 

X 0113 Y71

 

3.1

 

3.1

 

2.1

 

3.0

 

2.8

 

Prograin

 

PR 9935

 

3.2

 

2.8

 

2.6

 

2.7

 

2.8

 

Pioneer

 

P 90B72

 

3.2

 

2.9

 

2.0

 

3.3

 

2.8

 

Pioneer

 

P 91B52

 

3.4

 

3.7

 

1.6

 

2.7

 

2.8

 

U. of MN

 

M94-135066

 

3.2

 

3.0

 

2.0

 

3.2

 

2.8

 

Prograin

 

OAC Vision

 

2.8

 

3.1

 

2.5

 

3.0

 

2.9

 

Prograin

 

PR 5005.83

 

3.0

 

2.6

 

2.8

 

3.2

 

2.9