1 September 2006

 

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2006

 

R. Jay Goos and Brian Johnson, Department of Soil Science, NDSU, Fargo, ND 58105

e-mail:  rj.goos@ndsu.edu

 

Field studies were set out at five locations in 2006, to measure the resistance of about 180 soybean varieties to iron chlorosis.  The sites were located near Arthur, Colfax, Galchutt, Galesburg, and Prosper, ND.  The sites ranged in pH from 8.1 to 8.3, salinity (EC) from 0.2 to 0.8 mmho/cm, and CaCO3 contents ranging from 2 to 8 %.  Thirty five seeds were planted in short (5Õ) rows on 30-inch centers.  The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications at each site. 

 

Visual ratings were made on a 1-5 scale, with 1=representing no chlorosis and 5= the most severe chlorosis.   Ratings were taken at the 2-3 trifoliolate, 5-6 trifoliolate, and two weeks after the 5-6 trifoliolate stage.  Only the first two ratings were made at Prosper, due to recovery from chlorosis.  The Galchutt site was lost, due to an unusually heavy white grub infestation.

 

Ten ÒstandardÓ varieties were entered, to help in the interpretation of the results.  The varieties, listed in expected order from the most resistant to most susceptible, were Iowa State  ISU A11 > Seeds 2000 2070RR >  Traill = Council > Asgrow 0801 = Peterson PFS 0202RR > Glacier >Mycogen 5072 = Stine 0480 = NuTech 0505RR.  The variety ISU A11 represents the highest level of chlorosis resistance available in current breeding lines. All standards were entered twice, to show the degree of variation in our ratings. 

 

The summary of the chlorosis scores, averaged across site and the three ratings, are shown in Table 1. Each chlorosis rating in Table 1 represents the average of 44 observations.  The year 2006 was an unusual year, with below-normal precipitation.  Overall chlorosis was greater in 2006 than in prior years, perhaps due to intensification of salinity effects in a dry year. 

 

The ÒstandardÓ varieties are listed in bold typeface in Table 1.   The standards at the top (ISU A11, Seeds 2000 2070RR) and at the bottom (Glacier, Mycogen 5072, Stine 0480, NuTech 0505RR) came out exactly as expected.  The varieties Òin the middleÓ came out in  a very narrow range.  Traill, Council, Asgrow 0801, and PFS 0202RR were in a range of +/- 0.2 chlorosis unit, when the data were averaged.

 

Chlorosis severity differs from year to year, and it is impossible to give exact recommendations as to what level of chlorosis resistance is appropriate for a specific field.  In general, the more severe the chlorosis a field produces, the higher on the list a farmer should be, consistent with other agronomic considerations, such as maturity.

 

This report is also available online at:   www.yellowsoybeans.com

 

This research was sponsored by the North Dakota Soybean Council.


 

Table 1.  Average chlorosis scores, across two ratings and five locations, North Dakota, 2006.

 

Company

Variety

Avg

Standard

ISU A11

1.6

Standard

ISU A11

1.7

Univ. of MN

M00-307055

1.7

Canterra Seeds

PR 416905

1.8

Croplan Genetics

RT0043

1.8

Proseed

RR 50-045

1.9

Standard

S2000 2070 RR

1.9

NorthStar

NS0021 RR

1.9

NorthStar

NS0011 RR

1.9

Univ. of MN

M98-108027

2.0

Gold Country Seed

426 RR

2.0

Proseed

RR 60-95

2.0

Pioneer

90M01

2.1

Standard

S2000 2070 RR

2.1

Nutech

0066 RR

2.1

Wensman

W20051 RR

2.1

Pioneer

PHI SoyVar 2-06

2.1

Sabre

0206-15 RR

2.1

Dekalb

EXP 5007 A

2.2

Legend Seeds

LS 0707 RR

2.2

Peterson Farms Seed

07006 RR

2.2

Prairie Brand Seed

PB-0796 RR

2.2

Stine

0056-4

2.2

Stine

0063-4

2.2

Thunder Seeds

703 RR

2.2

Thunder Seeds

709 RR

2.2

Kruger Seed

K-042 RR

2.2

Roughrider Genetics

RG 601NRR

2.2

Peterson Farms Seed

0709 RR

2.2

NuTech

0706+RR

2.3

Prairie Brand Seed

PB-00736 RR

2.3

 

 


 

 

 

Company

Variety

Avg

Prograin

PR 6231 A02 rr

2.3

Gold Country Seed

2703 RR

2.3

Ziller

Exp 45103R

2.3

Proseed

RR 60-06

2.3

Univ. of MN

M00-327021

2.3

Stine

0306-4

2.3

Croplan Genetics

RT0406

2.3

NuTech

0525 RR

2.3

Thunder Seeds

707 RR

2.3

Roughrider Genetics

RG 607RR

2.3

Proseed

RR 60-40

2.3

Thunder Seeds

27007 RR

2.3

Standard

Council

2.4

NuTech

0706 RR

2.4

Legend Seeds

LS 0057 RR

2.4

Legend Seeds

LS 0624 RR

2.4

Nutech

0090+RR

2.4

Production Partners

0055 RR

2.4

Legend Seeds

LS 0406 RR

2.4

Standard

Asgrow 0801 RR

2.4

Standard

Traill

2.4

Garst

0312RR

2.4

Wensman

W2086 RR

2.4

Hyland Seeds

RR Royal

2.4

Univ. of MN

M00-307023

2.4

Ziller

BT 7102R

2.4

Stine

0060-64

2.4

Thunder Seeds

27005 RR

2.4

Wensman

W20074 RR

2.4

Gold Country Seed

3709 RR

2.5

Dyna-Gro

30A06

2.5

Proseed

RR 50-07

2.5

 

 


 

 

 

Company

Variety

Avg

Legend Seeds

LS 0255 RR

2.5

Wensman

W2030 RR

2.5

Mycogen

Atlas 5B034

2.5

Mycogen

Atlas 5A009

2.5

Garst

0549RR

2.5

Kruger Seed

K-009+RR

2.5

Kruger Seed

K-086 RR

2.5

Proseed

RR 60-05

2.5

Asgrow

AG 0301

2.5

Croplan Genetics

RT0669

2.5

Standard

PFS 0202 RR

2.5

Dyna-Gro

32T03

2.5

Hyland Seeds

RR Reliant

2.5

Prairie Brand Seeds

PB-00576 RR

2.5

Standard

Council

2.5

Standard

Traill

2.5

Wensman

W2064 RR

2.5

Hyland Seeds

RR Richwood

2.5

Prairie Brand Seed

PB-0356 RR

2.5

Prairie Brand Seeds

PB-0856 RR

2.5

Production Partners

0701+RR

2.5

Standard

PFS 0202 RR

2.6

Mycogen

Atlas X56006

2.6

NuTech

0330+RR

2.6

Gold Country Seeds

923 RR

2.6

Hyland Seeds

RR Ridgeway

2.6

Pioneer

PHI SoyVar 3-06

2.6

Wensman

W20092 RR

2.6

Pioneer

PHI SoyVar 1-06

2.6

Standard

Asgrow 0801 RR

2.6

Kruger Seed

K-120 RR

2.6

Sabre